Salazar and matchebenashshewish band of pottawatomi indians v. Salazar that the secretary of the interior did not have the authority to take land into trust for a tribe that was not under federal jurisdiction at the time that the indian reorganization act. In his first trip to the court, he overcame objections that he lacked prudential standing and. The high court upheld a previous ruling in carcieri vs. Supreme court ruled that a 1934 statute provides no authority for the secretary of the interior soi to take land into trust for the narragansett indian tribe tribe because the statute applies only to tribes under federal. Patchak, a neighboring land owner, sued under the administrative procedures act, challenging the secretarys decision on the ground that the tribe was not under federal jurisdiction as of the date. Supreme court sides with indian country in longrunning. As you know, in carcieri, the supreme court held that land could not be taken into trust for the narragansett tribe of rhode island under section 5 of the indian reorganization act of 1934. However, the disappointing results in both cases suggest. Protecting the indian reorganization act trust acquisition authority. In 1991, the narragansett indian tribe purchased a 31acre parcel of land in charlestown, ri to build a housing complex for the elderly.
Get free access to the complete judgment in patchak v. Addressing the costly administrative burdens and negative. In response to the patchak decision, the bureau of indian affairs bia of the. Salazar surname meaning and origin about genealogy. His lawsuit was based on the supreme court decision in carcieri v. The plaintiffs in carcieri were a town, a state and the governor.
Supreme court ruled that a 1934 statute provides no authority for the secretary of the interior soi to take land into trust for the. The federal government has waived its sovereign immunity from the respondents suit under the administrative procedure act, in which he alleges that section 465 of the indian reorganization act did not authorize the secretary. Salazar that the definitions in 479 of the ira limit this. Patchak, a private landowner, brought suit in 2008, arguing that the secretary of the. Despite carcieri, the secretary urged the district court to dismiss patchaks suit. Patchak was a concerned citizen with standing to bring a suit against the federal government. On writ of certiorari to the united states court of. The court agreed with patchaks argument that 479 of the indian reorganization actthe iralimited the secretarys trust authority to indian tribes under federal jurisdiction when the ira became law in 1934. Department of the interior, acting at the tribes request, moved to take the land into federal trust, thereby placing it largely under federal and tribal control, in 1998. Interior department shouldnt ignore carcieri in patchak.
The district court did not reach the merits of patchaks carcieri claim, but instead dismissed his action. Notwithstanding that good turn, patchak still faced jurisdictional obstacles that would take years to litigate. The court reasoned that patchaks interests do not only not fall within the iras zoneofinterests, but actively run contrary to it. Salazar, which some believe is proof that the poarch creek indians are. Petitioners contend that the term now refers to the time of the statutes enactment, and permits the secretary to take land into trust for members of recognized tribes that were under federal jurisdiction in 1934. The interior improvement act land in trust legislation. Patchak held that private citizens can challenge trust land acquisitions under the administrative procedure act on the theory that the acquisition runs afoul of carcieri. Salazar must be legislatively overridden to protect the ira trust acquisition authority kendall mccoy introduction.
Supreme court ruled that a 1934 statute provides no authority for the secretary of the interior soi to take land into trust for the narragansett indian tribe tribe because the statute applies only to tribes under federal jurisdiction when that law was enacted. Senate committee on indian affairs examines controversial. Supreme court sides with michigan tribe in decadeold casino squabble. Salazar must be legislatively overridden to protect the ira trust acquisition authority kendall mccoy pdf. At issue was whether the narragansett tribe was a recognized indian tribe now under federal jurisdiction within. Native american law watch modrall sperling law firm. Land ownership allows for the preservation of distinct nationhood, making it central to the sovereignty of indian tribes. Listed below are the cases that are cited in this featured case. Patchak filed suit challenging the authority of the secretary of the interior to invoke the indian reorganization act, 25 u. Witness list for scia hearing on carcieri and patchak rulings tuesday, september 11, 2012 the senate indian affairs committee will hold a hearing this thursday to discuss the u. Article title perhaps congress would, perhaps congress shouldwhy matchebenashshewish band of pottawatomi indians v. Salazar congressional research service summary in carcieri v. Feb 25, 2008 in 1991, the narragansett indian tribe purchased a 31acre parcel of land in charlestown, ri to build a housing complex for the elderly.
Courts have upheld interiors broad discretion to decide whether lands should be acquired in trust. A case in which the court found that only tribes under federal jurisdiction at the time of the indian reorganization act of 1934 are subject to. Protecting the indian reorganization act trust acquisition. Salazar, a february 2009 supreme court decision which held that the interior department does not have the authority to take lands into federal trust for tribes not recognized by the federal government prior to the indian reorganization act ira of 1934. Accompanying me today are del laverdure, the principal deputy assistant secretary indian affairs, and jodi gillette, the deputy assistant secretary indian affairs. United states department of the interior and sally jewell, secretary of the interior, defendantsappellees, appeal from the district court for the district of columbia. In the suprem coure t of alabama and nex frient odf. Witness list for scia hearing on carcieri and patchak rulings. In response to the patchak decision, the bureau of indian affairs. The secretary offers a distinction between those cases and patchaks. Jul 31, 2014 the carcieri decision stated that tribal governments not specifically recognized when the indian reorganization act was adopted in 1934 were unable to have land taken into trust by the bia on their behalf. Its a bad sign when a supreme court justice disrespects a young indian woman, nazune menka, when asked about the carcieri v.
Salazar, secretary of the interior, and larry echo hawk, in his official capacity as assistant secretary of the united states department of the interior, bureau of indian affairs, defendants, and matchebenashshewish band of pottawatomi indians, intervenordefendant. The federal government has waived its sovereign immunity from the respondents suit under the administrative procedure act, in which he alleges that section 465 of the indian reorganization act did not authorize the secretary of the interior to acquire into trust property that the band intended to use for gaming purposes because the band was not a federally recognized tribe. Salazar opinion of the court federal jurisdiction in 479. In patchak s suit, the gun lake tribe intervened as a defendant.
The band was not federally recognized until 1999, which patchak argued was more than 65 years too late. Three weeks later, on february 24, the supreme court issued its opinion in carcieri v. Supreme court brings bad news to tribes by taking up land case. It soon became clear patchak s argument was a winner. David patchak challenged the departments 2005 decision to take land into trust on behalf of the. Perhaps congress would, perhaps congress shouldwhy match. How the department of interior can invoke an alternative source of existing statutory authority to overcome an adverse judgment under the chevron doctrine. In affirming, the first circuit found 479 ambiguous as to the meaning of now under federal jurisdiction, applied the principles of chevron u. While patchaks suit was pending, the supreme court embraced this interpretation of the ira in carcieri v. The district court dismissed patchaks claims, concluding he lacked standing to vindicate violations of the ira. Salazar could also mean a dweller in or near the house or palace, or a dweller near the place sacred to st. The holding, coupled with the holding in carcieri v. Neither in patchak nor in broader constitutional context does congresss latitude to authorize constitutional violations rise and fall with klein.
Patchak which cast doubt on the title to native land and dramatically expand the rights of nearby owners to sue by challenging native use of that land. Moreover, the carcieri decision has spawned more harmful litigation, including salazar v. This is an action for habeas corpus brought by bartolome caunca in behalf of his cousin estelita flores who was employed by the far eastern employment bureau, owned by. Salazar congressional research service 1 introduction on february 24, 2009, the u. Zinke stresses need for separation of powers law360. Kendall mccoy, perhaps congress would, perhaps congress shouldwhy matchebenashshewish band of pottawatomi indians v.
On february 24, 2009, the supreme court of the united states decided in carcieri v. Supreme court issued a 63 decision in the case of carcieri et al. Kenneth lee salazar, in his official capacity as secretary of the united states department of the interior, et al. Salazar,18 might provide the impetus for congressional fixes to both. The senate indian affairs committee will hold a hearing this thursday to discuss the u. By 2009, the court had embraced this interpretation of the ira in another partys suit. Patchak sued claiming the secretary lacked power under the ira to take the land into trust because the band was not federally recognized in 1934 when the ira was enacted. Indian law practice group releases supreme court alert. Department of the interior, acting at the tribes request, moved to take the land into federal trust, thereby placing it.
Citations are also linked in the body of the featured case. The fact that patchak adds to the problems caused by another contentious, recentlydecided indian law case, carcieri v. Audio transcription for oral argument november 03, 2008 in carcieri v. Zinke, separation of powers, and the pitfalls of form over substance.
This summer, the united states supreme court magnified the problem created by. Salazar overturned a longstanding interpretation of the indian reorganization act of 1934 and held that the phrase indian tribe now under federal jurisdiction limits interiors authority to acquire land in trust for indian tribes. Salazar decision against the narragansett nation, and worse when the justice mocks the case itself, calling it a laugher. The gun lake casino opened in february 2011, while patchak, who lives about three miles away, was challenging the tribes landintotrust application. Salazar must be legislatively overridden to protect the ira trust acquisition authority.
Jan 27, 2019 the salazar surname indicates one who came from salazar in northern burgos, castile, spaina place name meaning corral or manor house probably from sala, meaning hall and basque zahar, meaning old. Salazar congressional research service 1 recent development. Roberts, jr justice thomas has our opinion this morning in case 07526, carcieri versus salazar. Salazar,1 ruled that the secretary of the interior soi did not have authority to take land into trust for the narragansett indian tribe. Indian tribal lands and the carcieri fix the heritage. Litigation following patchak i introduced an additional layer of procedural uncertainty into the. While well documented in historic records and surviving as a community, the tribe was largely dispossessed of its lands while under guardianship by the state of rhode island before suing in the 20th century. According to the district court, because it is currently federallyrecognized and existed at the time of the enactment of the ira, the narragansett tribe qualifies as an indian tribe within the meaning of 479. The administration is consistently on record as strongly supporting congresss effort to address the united states supreme court court decision in carcieri v. Still, theres little danger that the case, known as patchak v. A year later, there are as many as seven carcieri cases pending across the united states at both state and federal levels.
Dec 05, 2012 indian tribal lands and the carcieri fix. Confronted with this courts holdings in patchak i and carcieri, the tribe sought a way to terminate petitioners case, which they perceived as. Senate committee on indian affairs examines controversial supreme court decisions carcieri and patchak. Final boss in every resident evil game and their final form main games in order part 1 duration. Based on this alleged statutory violation, patchak sought to. Supreme court sides with gun lake tribe in decadeold casino. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. The indian reorganization act ira, enacted in 1934, authorizes the secretary of interior, a respondent here, to acquire land and hold it in trust for the purpose of providing land for indians, 25 u. Salazar audio transcription for opinion announcement february 24, 2009 in carcieri v. Salazar syllabus that, since the tribe is currently federally recognized and was in existence in 1934, it is a tribe under 479. From carcieri to matchebe nashshewish band of pottawatomi indians v. Patchak, where the supreme court ruled that individuals have six years to challenge a tribes trust land acquisition, and big lagoon rancheria v.
Salazar is another example, although the land there was to be used for indian housing rather than gaming. The carcieri problem was amplified even further when the supreme court decided matchebenashshewish band of potawatomi indians v. The tribe filed an action in federal district court alleging that the state had violated the good. From carcieri to matchebenashshewish band of pottawatomi indians v.
916 894 655 1029 1113 137 118 360 521 198 1113 90 87 286 491 1240 1054 249 48 49 145 50 822 190 790 379 180 1349 809 1035 1207 745